Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Colorado Mountain Pine Beetle Infestation: A look at causes

Part of a Series...
Introduction


The Mountain Pine Beetle infestation in Colorado’s mountains has killed more than 1.5 million trees in the past decade adversely impacting Colorado’s ecology, economy, and aesthetic. The consequences of the infestation shall be extensive, long-term, and costly in many respects. This review explores the etiology of the infestation, responses to the infestation, environmental and economic impacts, and offers a multi-pronged approach for present and future management.

Methodology

A significant amount of the reviewed literature is sourced from official government- or university-produced literature, including National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), U.S. Forest Service, Colorado State University, Environmental Protection Agency, Colorado Governor’s Energy Office, and United States patents and publications. The remainder of resources for this review derive from peer-reviewed literature as it pertained to forest management and the mountain pine beetle.

The Nature and Extent of the Infestation

For more than 150 years, the state of Colorado has enjoyed densely-colorful evergreen forests and subsequently benefits from substantial tourism revenues relating to its abundant forests and National Parks. However, since 1998 , Colorado has suffered from a severe infestation of Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB) or dendroctonus ponderosae hopkins, which has since reached epidemic proportions and is devastating the state’s scenic landscape.

Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) are tall, thin, deeply colored evergreens. Pinus contorta means “twisted pine.” The subspecies found in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado is latifolia. Lodgepole pines thrive in abundant sunlight and in cold, dry climates such as those conditions found in Colorado.

The current epidemic is not the first time Colorado pine has suffered from an infestation. A less severe outbreak of MPB in the mid-1970s proved to be relatively self-limiting, possibly due to, in part to less extreme weather conditions than what co-exist with today’s epidemic.

By 2009, sixty-eight percent of the Colorado lodgepole pine forest were infected by MPB. Today, residents, scientists, and government officials remain concerned because infestation is now spreading to other prevalent Colorado pine species, including Ponderosa Pine and spruce and fir trees. Management approaches to the infestation have ranged from no intervention to intense pesticide spraying. Yet the reason the rate of infestation has slowed among lodgepole pines appears to be because there simply aren’t many more lodgepole pines to be consumed. It is estimated that it will take fifty to one hundred years before the landscape aesthetically recovers. To be continued...

References cited:
[1] Ciesla, W. et al.  The Health of Colorado Forests: Special Issue: Threats to Colorado's Current and Future Forest Resources. Report (Colorado State Forest Service and United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 2009).
[2] United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Service: Nature & Science. Trees – Lodgepole pine: Plants and Trees. (n.d.) Retrieved July 30, 2011, from http://www.fs.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsinternet/!ut/p/c4/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP0os3gjAwhwtDDw9_AI8zPyhQoY6BdkOyoCAGixyPg!/?navtype=BROWSEBYSUBJECT&cid=fsed_009750&navid=150130000000000&pnavid=150000000000000&ss=110402&position=Feature.Html&ttype=detail&pname=Boise%2520National%2520Forest-%2520Nature
[3] Ibid.
[4] Mc Cambridge, W.F. et al. Ponderosa Pine Mortality Resulting from a Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak. Research Paper RM-235 (United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Colorado, September 1982).
[5] Ciesla, W. et al.  The Health of Colorado Forests: Special Issue: Threats to Colorado's Current and Future Forest Resources. Report (Colorado State Forest Service and United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 2009).
[6] Kaufmann M.R. et al. The status of our scientific understanding of lodgepole pine and mountain pine beetles – a focus on forest ecology and fire behavior. GFI technical report 2008-2 (The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA., 2008).

About the Author: Allison Frederick writes on environmental and sustainability related issues, particularly as they relate to environmental psychology and green brand strategy.

Monday, August 22, 2011

A High Chess IQ? Implementing Biofuel and Biodiesel Sustainably



Problem solving includes looking forward, employing what we at GRIPS call “Chess IQ.” Chess IQ is a person’s ability to think ahead. A person who acts by thinking only one step ahead has a low chess IQ. A person who acts, thinking of possible outcomes and consequences three steps ahead has a relatively higher Chess IQ.


Building a business is challenging but building a sustainable business with consideration of your business impact on the environment, social strata, and longevity requires a significant investment in commitment, thinking, research, planning, and metrics. A sustainable business plan is not written and placed in an investor binder, never to be consulted again. Instead, it must be referred to continuously as the benchmark for all business decisions. Thus, the commitment, thinking, research, planning, and metrics chain is a constant loop serving as a guide for daily business operations and strategy.

The Corn-Soy biofuel experiment is a recent example of a strategy that gained significant investment, commitment, and publicity but the overall plan demonstrated a low Chess IQ. In retrospect, we see that stop-gaps were not put into place and little consideration seemed to be given to basic economic principles such as supply and demand in the food-fuel cycle, and land use displacement, or what the International Union of Conservation of Nature (IUCN) refers to as Indirect Land Use Change – (ILUC).

IUCN’s well produced, animated video leads the viewer along a high Chess IQ path, using the bio food-fuel model as a demonstration. The video takes into consideration efficiency, land use displacement, and distribution – all three considerations are normal business supply-chain considerations. This video is an excellent teaching tool to help people begin to think about development a sustainable approach to biofuel energy solutions.

Allison Frederick is an Intellectual Property Educator and Innovation Marketing Consultant for GRIPS - GReen Idea Protection and Sales. She offers risk management assessments for renewable energy and green energy technology companies and her company also provides technology companies effective, affordable marketing strategies to produce attractive requests for proposals, investor materials, product manuals, and product promotion materials.

Saturday, July 2, 2011

BioMass Energy Intro Guide: Great for Your Board, Venture Capitalist Proposal, and Other Investors

The National Wildlife Federation released a free pdf publication entitled “Growing a Green Energy Future: A Primer and Vision for Sustainable Biomass Energy” (March 2010). This full color 40 page publication is an excellent introduction to the Biomass Energy initiatives and industry. It would be an excellent referral publication for board members, venture capitalists, and other investors who are new to the biomass energy industry.


It is appears to be a very honest survey of the industry including an exploration of what I call the “ethanol experiment,” where massive investment and legislation fueled a strong emergence of an alternative fuel source before analysis of the overall economic impact could be assessed.

The publication explains biodiesel (from corn and soybeans), “first generation” biofuels, biomass energy sources including forest or woody biomass, crop biomass, and waste biomass. The publication also proposes sustainable management strategies that include newly developed assessments of overall greenhouse gas costs in producing biomass energy. Read “Growing a Green Energy Future: A Primer and Vision for Sustainable Biomass Energy” by the National Wildlife Federation.

Author: Allison Frederick


Allison Frederick is an Intellectual Property Educator and Innovation Marketing Consultant for GRIPS - GReen Idea Protection & Sales. She offers risk management assessments for renewable energy and green energy technology companies and her company also provides technology companies effective, affordable marketing strategies to produce attractive requests for proposals, investor materials, product manuals, and product promotion materials.

Monday, June 27, 2011

New Look, New Mission

There is a real need for renewable energy and green tech companies to manage not just natural resources but also financial resources committed to intellectual property. This site will give you resources to help you with this task.